This COST Action will focus on the scientific understanding of the effects of cryoprotection, the development of efficient cryopreservation protocols and the dissemination of the findings for application in plant germplasm collections. The scientific programme has been developed with the input of researchers from 17 different COST countries. Taking into account their research priorities 2 main Working Groups (WGs) have been identified.
![]() |
![]() |
Within this WG, two major research topics can be distinguished : 1.1 fundamental aspect of cryopreservation and cryoprotection and 2.1 genetic stability and traceability.
This part mainly aims at the elucidation of the physico-biochemical background of cryoprotection and cryopreservation. For this, physico-biochemical changes associated with cryoprotection will be studied and correlated with post-thaw viability rates.
Specific
objectives of this part are:
1. To define changes of the “Key parameters” during
the application of different cryopreservation protocols;
2. To determine the relation between these changes and cryopreservation
ability
3. To find treatments which improve the cryopreservation ability
of plant tissue through a manipulation of the “Key parameters”
This part mainly deals with the assessment of the genetic integrity of plants to determine if they are ‘true to type’ after cryopreservation.
Specific objectives of this part are;
1. To develop recommendations and techniques to assess genetic stability
of plants and plant tissues after cryopreservation
2. To give a guidance to cryobiologists how to limit mutational events
and genetic changes during the cryopreservation procedure as well as
during storage in liquid nitrogen.
This part mainly aims at the elucidation of the physico-biochemical background of cryoprotection and cryopreservation. For this, physico-biochemical changes associated with cryoprotection will be studied and correlated with post-thaw viability rates.
Currently,
for each species and tissue type, a cryopreservation protocol needs
to be developed / adapted to the natural cold, freezing and desiccation
resistance of the species, explant size and type.
Cryopreservation protocols are largely developed through empirical studies and care is thereby taken to avoid ice intracellular crystallisation during the freezing process causing physical damage to the tissue.
The only way to prevent ice crystal formation at ultra-low temperatures without an extreme reduction in moisture content is through vitrification i.e. non-crystalline solidification of water (Sakai et al., 1990). To obtain a vitrified solution, it needs to be sufficiently concentrated and/or cooling rates need to be high (Fahy et al., 1984).
The existing cryogenic strategies rely on freeze-dehydration, addition of cryoprotective substances including the recently developed plant vitrification solutions, desiccation and acclimatisation or combinations of these processes. It is now generally accepted that the critical step to achieve post-thaw survival lies in the dehydration step and not in the freezing step itself.
The key for successful cryopreservation thus lies in the induction of tolerance to dehydration / desiccation. In practice, this tolerance is induced by sugar treatment, osmotic treatment, cold acclimatisation, ABA treatment, etc., depending on the plant species, tissue type and research group.
The induction of freezing tolerance in nature is now more and more subject to intensive investigations. A wide range of studies indicates that the cell membrane systems are the primary site of freezing injury in plants. Freeze tolerance mechanisms depend on the membrane stabilisation (through changes in lipid composition, production of membrane protecting polypeptides), the water status in the plant cell, the change of the proteins and cytoskeletal proteins, the accumulation of sugars, polyamines and the induction of anti-oxidative mechanisms.
The most damaging physical event during cryopreservation is caused by developing intracellular ice crystals during the cooling/thawing process. This can be prevented through vitrification, i.e. solidification of water in an amorphous (non-crystalline) form. Vitrification of intracellular water can be achieved by reducing the amount of freezable water in cells and/or the use of very high cooling/thawing rates. Studies of all parameters and their relation to cryopreservation ability thus offers considerable potential for the improvement of conservation methods.
Figure : Key parameters involved in cryoprotection
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
There are many issues and concerns regarding investigations into the genetic stability of plant germplasm after recovery from cryopreservation. One central theme is the lack of international agreement and consensus in approaching generic solutions acceptable to a wide range of conservation activities. Although, it is recognised, that the effects of cryoinjury upon the genome are often unknown, and any accumulative DNA polymorphisms may not be induced by cryopreservation per se but as the result of the whole culture-cryoprotection-regeneration process, it is generally experimentally difficult to detect what specific stages generate genomic instability. Higher plant cells exhibit the phenomenon of somaclonal variation, which can be manifest as manifold plant variations. Consequently, successful cryopreservation is often judged by the survival of the tissue and ability to regenerate into complete plants, thereby it is desirable to assess the genetic integrity of plants to determine if they are ‘true to type’ after cryopreservation
Techniques to assess genetic stability
The genetic integrity of plants at the phenotypic, cytological, biochemical
and molecular levels and its relevance to stability investigations have
been reviewed (Harding, 2004; Harding et al., 1997). Briefly, these
include:
· Assessments of phenotypic variation with defined morphological
descriptors for a given species, whereby stem, leaf, root, flower, fruit
and growth habit can be analysed collectively by a range of multi-variate
statistical techniques.
· Cytological techniques to detect various types of chromosomal
instability. Variant cells with gross chromosomal changes may include:
polyploidy, aneuploidy and other mitotic abnormalities.
· Biochemical metabolite/protein (isozyme) profiles that are
useful to compare changing patterns in gene expression in plants recovered
from cryopreservation.
· Genomic DNA sequences that can be analysed using a range of
hybridisation and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) techniques for which
several investigations report evidence of stability after cryopreservation.
· Epi-genetic variation in chromatin and DNA methylation of gene
sequences which have been found in plants after cryopreservation, suggesting
altered patterns of gene expression.
Cryobionomics
The concept of ‘Cryobionomics’ was first introduced and
explored by Harding (2004). It addresses the issues and inherent weakness
in current genetic stability investigations leading to concerted action
for the basis of an acceptable international agreement in the characterisation
of cryopreserved germplasm. The conceptual impact of ‘Cryobionomics’
on European germplasm repositories and culture collections is fundamental
for this COST Action in order to fully explore its implication.
Within this WG, two major research topics can be distinguished; i.e. (i) the technology aspects of the different cryopreservation techniques and (ii) Impact and applications: links to and integration with conventional plant resources and genebanks, establishment of cryo-bank, dissemination of results.
This
part mainly deals with the applications of cryopreservation protocols
to different plant species and tissues.
The cryopreservation technologies that will be used are based on existing protocols that are mainly developed through empirical studies, knowledge of traditional controlled rate freezing and contemporary protocols based on the multidisciplinary fundamental approaches aimed at understanding cryoinjury and tolerance as described under WG1.
Specific
objectives of this part are:
1. To develop efficient cryopreservation protocols partially based
on the elucidation of the mode of action of cryoprotection /tolerance
to cryopreservation.
2. To apply the cryopreservation protocols to a wide variety of plant
species/tissues derived from species exhibiting different natural tolerances
to cold, freezing and desiccation stress.
This part mainly deals with making links between the more technical aspects of cryopreservation (see previous parts) and plant genetic resources and genebanks, establishment of cryo-bank and dissemination of results
Specific
objectives of this part are:
1. To disseminate the improved cryopreservation
protocols developed by the COST Action participants to relevant European
industries, research institutes and genebanks through the development
of a plant cryopreservation manual and the organisation and implementation
of specialised training courses.
2. To provide policy makers with first hand information on the role
of existing and the potential of the new cryopreservation protocols
in the sustainable utilisation of Europe’s plant genetic resources
in key application sectors and in meeting the needs of the international
conservation agendas.
This
part mainly deals with the applications of cryopreservation protocols
to different plant species and tissues.
The cryopreservation technologies that will be used are based on existing protocols that are mainly developed through empirical studies, knowledge of traditional controlled rate freezing and contemporary protocols based on the multidisciplinary fundamental approaches aimed at understanding cryoinjury and tolerance as described under WG1.
Two requirements must be met to prevent lethal ice crystallisation during cryopreservation: (i) rapid freezing rates, and (ii) a concentrated cellular solution.
The
cell cytosol can be concentrated through air drying, freeze dehydration,
application of penetrating or non-penetrating substances (cryoprotectants),
or adaptive metabolism (hardening).
For a solution to be vitrified at high cooling rates, a reduction in water content to at least 20-30% is required. Most hydrated tissues, however, do not withstand dehydration to moisture contents needed for vitrification (20-30%) due to solution and mechanical effects.
Exceptions are pollen, seeds, dormant buds and somatic embryos of most temperate seed species.
The
key for successful cryopreservation is thus shifted from freezing tolerance
to dehydration tolerance.
This tolerance can be induced by chemical cryoprotection with substances like sugars, amino acids, DMSO, glycerol, etc. but can also be induced by adaptive metabolism like cold hardening in temperate species and/or for less cold tolerance species.
All this is subject of investigations executed under WG1. The following cryopreservation protocols can be distinguished.
Air drying (evaporative drying, flash drying)
Classical slow-cooling (or slow-freezing) protocol
Air drying (evaporative drying, flash drying)
This method is directly applicable to seeds, dormant buds, zygotic embryos and pollen of many common agricultural and horticultural species. Flash (or ultra-rapid) drying proved to be beneficial for recalcitrant zygotic embryos of some plant species (Berjak et al., 2000). <top>
Classical slow-cooling (or slow-freezing) protocol
This was the first ‘standard’ protocol that was developed for hydrated plant tissues (Withers and King, 1982). It is based on slow cooling of specimens (at a rate of 0.5-2°C/min) in the presence of a cryoprotectant solution, generally containing DMSO at a 5-15% concentration. When during the slow-cooling process a temperature of about –40°C is reached, the intra-cellular solution is considered to be concentrated enough to vitrify upon a subsequent liquid nitrogen plunging. Now, this method is mainly used for cryopreservation of dormant buds and non-organised tissues, like cell suspensions and calli. This “more traditional” freezing method still has an outermost important place in plant cryopreservation and more specifically in biotechnology, cereal breeding and forestry (e.g. conifers) were they are used extensively, particularly in the commercial sector (Cyr, 2000). <top>
In this method, developed by Fabre and Dereuddre (1990), explants (usually meristems or embryos) are firstly encapsulated in alginate beads (which can contain also mineral salts and organics), thus forming “synthetic seeds” (“artificial seeds” or “synseeds”). Then, the synseeds are treated with a high sucrose concentration, dried down to a moisture content of 20-30% (under airflow or using silica gel) and subsequently rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. Although the procedure can be considered rather lengthy and labour-intensive, it is observed that the presence of a nutritive matrix (the bead) surrounding the explant can promote its regrowth after thawing. <top>
First reports on the use of a vitrification solution with plant tissues appeared in 1989 (Langis et al., 1989; Uragami et al., 1989). The technique relies on treatment of explants with a concentrated vitrification solution for variable periods of time (from 15 minutes up to 2 hours), followed by a direct plunge into liquid nitrogen (“vitrification/one-step freezing”). This results in both intra- and extra-cellular vitrification. Freezing rates of about 6°C/sec are normally obtained by plunging explants enclosed in a cryovial into liquid nitrogen. Higher cooling rates can be obtained by enclosing the meristems in semen straws, resulting in cooling rates of about 60°C/sec, or using a “droplet freezing protocol” where the material is placed on aluminium foil strips that are plunged directly into liquid nitrogen, giving rise to cooling rates of 130°C/sec (Panis et al., 2005; Schäfer-Menuhr et al., 1997). The vitrification solution consists of a concentrated mixture of penetrating and non-penetrating cryoprotectant substances. The most commonly applied solution, named “PVS2” (Plant Vitrification Solution n° 2), consists of 30% glycerol, 15% ethylene glycol, 15% DMSO (all v/v) and 0.4 M sucrose (Sakai et al., 1990). Fifteen years after its first report, vitrification is today a widely used cryopreservation protocol. The success of the procedure can be attributed to its easiness, high reproducibility and to the fact that it can successfully be applied to a wide range of tissues and plant species. <top>
Other available methods are the “droplet freezing” (Schäfer-Menuhr et al., 1997), the “preculture method” (Panis et al., 1996), the “encapsulation/ vitrification” (Sakai., 2000) and the“preculture/dehydration” (Dumet et al., 1993). These techniques have been up to now applied to only a limited number of plant species.<top>
This part mainly deals with making links between the more technical aspects of cryopreservation (see previous parts) and plant genetic resources and genebanks, establishment of cryo-bank and dissemination of results
In Europe, there is a large number of crops, including roots and tubers
but also fruit trees, as well as forest tree species for which cryopreservation
represents the only option for safe and cost-effective long-term conservation
of genetic resources. However, if in vitro slow growth storage is used
in a number of genebanks for medium-term conservation of different species,
cryopreservation is currently only used routinely in a few exceptional
cases only (Frison and Serwinski, 1995; Turok et al., 1995). There is
an urgent need to disseminate information on this technology and to
train scientists and technicians in genebanks in the implementation
of cryopreservation protocols. In this part, the new cryopreservation
methods will be applied to the germplasm collections of the collaborating
institutes. At the same time the results will be validated and disseminated
through a plant cryopreservation manual and specialised training workshops
which will be attended by end users (European industries and scientific
and technical staff of relevant research institutes and genebanks) as
well as by decision makers.
In this part the choice of IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resources
Institute) as a partner is obvious. It is the largest international
agricultural research institute involved solely in research on conservation
of plant genetic resources. Its role in this COST Action is to help
disseminating the results and translating them into practical applications
to improve cryopreservation procedures for other crops than those incorporated
in this COST Action. In
Europe, IPGRI has two main programmes; (i) the European Cooperative
Programme for Crop Genetic Resources Networks (ECP/GR) and (ii) European
Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN).
